Bourne Diary - August 2010

by

Rex Needle

Saturday 7th August 2010

Photographed by Rex Needle
The brass serpent tombstone - see "One of the more . . . "

It is now more than two years since the Bourne Preservation Society applied to take over the Victorian chapel in the town cemetery with the intention of bringing it back into useful life yet members have still not been given a key to the door.

Their dossier on how the chapel could be saved was drawn up and presented to Bourne Town Council on 22nd April 2008 outlining their proposals for restoration and future management. Since then members have been active in seeking funds to finance their plans and in clearing debris from around the outside of the building preparatory to the major task but there does seem to be an impasse in proceeding with the legal niceties required for the granting of a lease to complete the handover.

This frustration surfaced in a report by The Local newspaper on Friday July 23rd recounting the latest talks between the trust and the council which seemed to be bogged down with rules and policy rather than finding a speedy method of surmounting the bureaucracy which is enough to dampen the enthusiasm of even the most eager volunteers. The discussion by the finance and general purposes committee the previous Tuesday was confined almost entirely to meetings and minutes and who should take the chair, whereas after such a long spell of negotiations the date for a handover would have been a more appropriate topic yet a proposal to give sole authority in these procedural matters to the council was carried by six votes to three. “The trust”, said the newspaper, “believes that this is an attempt by some councillors to derail the project but hope that this will not unduly affect progress.”

This remark has not gone down well with some members and Councillor Brian Fines (Bourne West) expressed his dismay in a letter to The Local which was printed in their correspondence columns last Friday (July 30th). He was anxious to dispel any impression that he and his colleagues “are specifically against the transfer of the chapel” and his letter to the newspaper went on: “I, for example, congratulated the trust for their practical work undertaken around the building and wished them success in obtaining finance in order to take over the chapel. I am not aware of any of our councillors who do not support such a transfer. I believe therefore that it is wrong for the trust, via your editorial, to say that any of the Bourne town councillors seek to scupper the deal.”

A recap on recent history might be useful. The chapel was built in 1855 and has been in the care of Bourne Town Council since 1974 yet has been allowed to decline into its present parlous state. When the proposal to demolish the building came before the council’s finance and general purposes committee on 9th January 2007, nine of the eleven members present voted in favour and seven of them are still serving on the council. Demolition was regarded as a fait accompli and discussions had already taken place on salvaging and recycling the stone. The chapel was subsequently listed Grade II on 4th April that year to prevent the town council from pulling it down.

A public survey on its future held in February 2008 was seen by many people as being flawed with poorly phrased, even misleading questions which also quoted the overall restoration cost to the council tax payer as £553,086, a figure considered to be grossly inflated. In the event, the form had an inadequate circulation with only 443 of the 7,000 printed being returned and although the council acknowledged this failure and promised an investigation, it has not been mentioned since. Then, despite having £40,000 in reserve solely for cemetery preservation, the town council agreed a grant of only £5,000 to help the restoration project on its way when it met on Tuesday 5th August 2008 but the decision was not unanimous with two councillors voting against giving any financial aid at all. In the event, even this money has not yet been paid out.

Councillors are right to be concerned about public opinion but they must understand that it has been influenced by past events and coupled with the current delay of two and a half years in handing over the building, which is an inordinately long time even by local government standards, has combined to create a widespread perception that the town council is not exactly enthusiastic about the idea. Meetings do not solve anything, merely adding to the already protracted proceedings and if they wish to demonstrate their confidence in the project and allay fears that they are not dragging their heels, as Councillor Fines has attempted to do, then a speedy decision is now called for.

This would not only justify the work the volunteers are doing but would also ensure that the handover of the chapel is completed as quickly as possible, certainly before the onset of another winter when the building is likely to deteriorate even further and with it the patience of those who are working so hard to save it. If the trust does become discouraged with the slow progress of negotiations, or the handover does not materialise as promised, then the chapel would most likely remain under the control of the town council and on past experience, its future would by no means be secure. It should also be remembered that if the Bourne Preservation Trust founders in its endeavours, then the onus of care will fall back on the town council and as the chapel is a Grade II listed building, neglect will no longer be an option and money will have to be found to repair and maintain the building.

The Queen has never visited Bourne, nor has any previous reigning monarch but several members of the Royal Family have been here in recent years, notably Princess Margaret who came in May 1997 to open the Margaret Hurst Day Care Centre at Digby Court, the residential care home for the elderly administered by the Orders of St John Trust, one of the 70 charities of which she was patron.

In earlier years, the Duke of Kent came to see the Lincolnshire Agricultural Show which was held at Bourne in June 1939 and to celebrate the occasion, the streets were gaily decorated with floral baskets hanging from the lamp posts, tubs of flowers, flags, banners and bunting festooned from buildings and across the roadways and special floodlighting effects along the riverside. He arrived by plane at RAF Wittering and then motored to the showground in a 60-acre field off the main A15 where the band of the Metropolitan Police played the National Anthem amid cheers from the crowd, many of them children who had been given the day off school.

In November 1989, the Duke of Gloucester visited the printing firm Warners (Midlands) plc to open the new £4 million extensions to their premises at the Old Maltings in West Street and in April 1999 the Duchess of Gloucester was guest of honour at the opening of new premises for Nursery Supplies (Bourne) Ltd on a 5½-acre site at the corner of the A151 Spalding Road and Meadow Drove.

It is therefore heartening to hear that another royal name is to be added to the list in that Prince Edward is coming in September to open extensions to the Abbey CE Primary School where a new block of three classrooms and a kitchen has been built, thus enabling the removal of previously used mobile accommodation. He will spend an hour at the school meeting pupils, staff and governors and cutting the ceremonial ribbon before leaving for another engagement at Grantham. The chairman, John Kirkman, said that the visit was a great honour for the school and for Bourne because, as he pointed out: “We do not get many royal visits.”

One of the more interesting tombstones in the churchyard dates from the 17th century and is elaborately carved with a biblical scene from the Old Testament which has been described as the plague of snakes, no doubt a reference to Exodus which recounts the events resulting in Moses leading the Israelites out of slavery through the Red Sea which parted to allow them cross and so on to Palestine and freedom. To secure their release, he sought the help of God to impose a series of abominable occurrences on the Egyptians “to let my people go” until the resistant and stubborn Pharaoh relented, a tale much favoured in Sunday school and which was so horrific as to be the stuff of childhood nightmares and is therefore indelibly etched into my memory, namely the story of the ten plagues.

The tombstone can be found in the churchyard quite near to the railings alongside the footpath in Church Walk and a reference to it can also be found in a booklet called The Story of the Abbey Church which was written by Charles Pask Matthews (1886-1956) soon after he retired after 25 years as headmaster of Bourne Grammar School. He was a worshipper at the Abbey Church where he took a particular interest in the building and this short history which appeared in 1951, became so popular that it ran to five editions and remains the starting point today for historians researching the 12th century church.

It included several pen sketches by Mrs A E Macleod, among them one of this carved tombstone which he quite clearly identifies as “representing The Plague of Snakes” although this is not exactly correct. The bible describes ten plagues which came in two waves, the first five being the Nile turning to blood, frogs, lice, flies and the death of all livestock, but when Pharaoh refused to budge, there followed five more, boils, hail, locusts, darkness and the death of the first born and when this came to pass, as the bible reports, “the Pharaoh finally sent the Israelites away”.

There is a widespread belief that snakes were among the ten plagues but closer examination of the text in Exodus Chapters 7 12 will reveal that this was not so and that this manifestation occurred before the visitation of the plagues when Moses first approached Pharaoh seeking permission for the Israelites to leave Egypt. When he refused, Moses showed him a miraculous sign of warning by turning his staff into a serpent at which the Pharaoh’s sorcerers also turned their staffs into serpents which were immediately swallowed by Moses’ serpent before it turned back into a staff and it is this event which is clearly depicted in the carving on the tombstone.

In fact, the picture is almost certainly a representation of another biblical story, that of the archaic brass serpent associated with Moses which is described in the Book of Numbers 21.6-9:

6. And the Lord sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died. 7. Therefore the people came to Moses, and said, We have sinned, for we have spoken against the Lord, and against thee; pray unto the Lord, that he take away the serpents from us. And Moses prayed for the people. 8. And the Lord said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live. 9. And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole, and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent of brass, he lived.

This narrative is the subject of many illustrations, particularly engravings, oil paintings and stained glass windows which compare favourably with the carving on the tombstone and depicting the brass serpent on the pole with Moses looking on and several people who had come to be saved recovering from their snake bites. Unfortunately, wind and weather have taken their toll on the stonework over the centuries and so we are unable to find out who is buried below or the exact date of death which would provide a clue to further research and perhaps establish why a picture from this particular story was used as a memorial. There must have been a very good reason to do so, perhaps because the person who occupies the grave was bitten by an adder and died as a result. Who knows?

Thought for the week: After I am dead I would rather have people ask why I have no monument than why I have one.
- Marcus Porcius Cato (234-149 BC), Roman statesman also known as Cato the Elder to distinguish him from his great grandson.

Saturday 14th August 2010

Photographed by Rex Needle

The last time the future of the public library in South Street was discussed in this column was in February 2009 when we reported grave misgivings about a possible relocation to the town hall because of the reduced space available and inadequate access. At that time, such a move was merely a proposal being considered by our three local authorities, Lincolnshire County Council, South Kesteven District Council and Bourne Town Council, as part of a scheme to bring all of their services under one roof and it was stressed that nothing had been decided.

Now it appears to be a fait accompli because The Local newspaper claims that the library will make such a move at some time in the future (August 6th) and if this is correct, then it will be going ahead with little or no public consultation.

Their report says that Bourne will be among the first of the smaller libraries in the county to benefit from a new £29,000 system of self-service computer units providing convenient and easy-to-use technology for borrowers and so free up valuable staff time. There will also be improvements in Internet access for the bank of computers and the introduction of new book stocks and the library is closing for the next two weeks while the improvements are implemented (from August 16th to 31st). The newspaper adds with some authority: “These improvements can simply move with the library when the new shared services facility is eventually built at the town hall.”

The scheme to close the present library premises which have been in use since 1969 is therefore part of the overall plan now being implemented despite misgivings in many quarters that it will result in a reduced service once it is installed in the old courtroom area of the town hall. Certainly the problem of access must be addressed because the front steps are out of the question for regular daily use, especially by the elderly and disabled, being narrow and tortuous and perhaps even dangerous. The town council is already aware of these difficulties which is why some of their open meetings are rescheduled for the Corn Exchange rather than risk the front entrance to the town hall which has been the subject of continual complaint. A lift has been suggested but it is doubtful if this can handle the large number of visitors to and from the library, especially at busy periods, while parking may also be a problem, especially on market days and Saturdays when Budgens car park is full and the area behind the Corn Exchange jammed with stalls, a situation which will be exacerbated once the new Co-operative Food supermarket starts trading in October.

But a major problem will be that of space, of fitting everything in to ensure that the library can function as smoothly and conveniently as it does at its present premises, and that is a doubtful prospect even though it has been proposed to install higher shelves for the books with ladders to reach them but it is doubtful if this bizarre solution would be well received by some of the older book borrowers with stiff joints and aching limbs who spend their lives avoiding steps at all costs.

One man with firm opinions on the subject is Ted Kelby, now aged 83, stalwart of local government in past times having served as a member of Bourne Urban District Council for fifteen years and as chairman for 1968-69, and he has already made his views known to the Bourne area Open Forum (Stamford Mercury, 23rd January 2009). “It bothers me that with all of the organisations that are interested whether we can really fit the library in”, he said. “In any case, we have a perfectly good building in South Street.”

This appears to be the opinion of the majority, except those in authority who will be making, or appear to have made, the decision but then they do not use the library. There appears to have been no attempt made to ask book borrowers their opinion of moving the library and, more importantly, what will happen to the old building once it has been vacated and in the present climate housing would most certainly be top of the list. This could also mean the closure of the fire station next door to create one large site which, given its close proximity to the Red Hall, would be a most attractive prospect for a development company such as Stamford Homes which is already busy filling the old railway station site next door with new properties.

The lengthy delay in the handover of the cemetery chapel to the Bourne Preservation Trust which was highlighted by this column last week is still causing dismay in many quarters and the discussion that has ensued in the Bourne Forum and in the town indicates a widespread belief that some councillors are less than enthusiastic and may be using procedural practice to hinder completion.

The mandate was clearly given at the town council meeting held at the Corn Exchange on Tuesday 24th June 2008 under the chairmanship of the mayor, Councillor Shirley Cliffe, and attended by eleven other councillors, 14 members of the public and the press. One of the major weaknesses appears to be the working party formed on 6th October 2009 to consider all issues relating to the chapel when it was decided that meetings should be open to every interested councillor without setting a membership level and this has resulted in a sporadic attendance whereas the Bourne Preservation Trust has a 100 per cent record.

There also seems to be a reluctance to acknowledge the status now enjoyed by the trust which has become an organisation of some standing with a healthy membership meeting regularly to hear speakers on various topics and its own web site as well as forging links with many heritage and conservation organisations at national level. More importantly, its work has been an inspiration to many other communities, including Boston and Holbeach, where volunteers are also engaged in preserving their cemetery chapels whose future was under threat. This work should be recognised by the town council with prompt and positive action.

Perhaps the issue is no longer a matter for the working party as it is currently constituted and the holding ad hoc meetings which have made such inadequate progress, thus creating the present impasse and a speedier agreement might be realised by positive action at full council level. Certainly, questions need to be asked why the working party has not completed the assigned task after such a long period and whether these meetings are competently convened to achieve it. Until these matters are addressed, there will be continuing public concern.

The local government elections are due to be held next May and if the current problem is not settled by then it could become an issue at the hustings when those who are believed to have discouraged the handover process might not find favour with the electorate at a time when they are trying to retain their seats. The discussion has however also revealed a great deal of apathy and even misunderstanding of the situation and such is the disenchantment and perhaps lack of knowledge with some people that they have even expressed the wish that a town centre redevelopment would be preferred to a restored cemetery chapel, two completely different issues being handled by separate local authorities although it would be a pity if both ventures ended in failure.

Attempts to demolish the cemetery chapel do bear a distinct similarity to events half a century ago which will not be lost on those who are acquainted with our history because it was a number of councillors who then tried repeatedly to ensure that the Red Hall suffered a similar fate.

During the railway age, the building was used as the booking office and as accommodation for the stationmaster but became redundant when the line closed in 1959 and the London and North Eastern Railway company offered it to the local authorities for a token payment of £1 which was refused by all of them. Our affairs in those days were in the hands of Bourne Urban District Council and when consulted, many members insisted that it was a useless building which had no future and should be left to fall down.

But help was at hand through the efforts of the late Councillor Jack Burchnell (1909-73) and after a long and determined fight, he ensured that Bourne United Charities acquired the freehold in 1962 and through grants and donations it was carefully and sympathetically restored and is now Grade II listed to protect it for the future. This fine example of Elizabethan architecture is now our most important secular building and Jack Burchnell has a permanent place in our history while those councillors who wanted it demolished are only remembered for their total lack of vision and imagination.

The Bourne web site has marked its 12th anniversary this week, a small milestone but we are pleased to record that we have been published continuously since Saturday 8th August 1998, making us the longest running community project on the Internet for a market town of this size.

We began with a handful of pages and pictures and were lucky to attract a few dozen visitors but have since expanded to a formidable size of 500 pages and more than 600 photographs, with around 2,000 people a week dropping in from around the world and consulted by a wide variety of academic, commercial, business and government organisations. We have consistently topped the Google ratings now for many years and anyone in the world who wishes to know about Bourne will automatically be directed to this web site. Take a look at our Visitor Countries feature and you will see the global coverage we have achieved in the past decade.

One of our most important features is our Family History section which has brought together families from all parts of the world seeking information about ancestors who originated in Bourne. Almost 400 names are currently listed for research and rarely a day goes by without an inquiry from overseas, usually Australia, Canada, the United States and New Zealand, the former colonies which attracted the more adventurous of our past residents who left to seek their fortunes and whose descendants are compiling family trees and are anxious to find out about the place where they originated.

Other features on many aspects of life in the town from past times are published regularly together with photographs reflecting the street scene in Bourne today. Our Forum is particularly popular, providing the opportunity for anyone to initiate and debate a subject of topical interest whether local, national or international, and has become the most lively discussion platform in Lincolnshire, often highlighting injustice and the anomalies of life so frequently overlooked by our local newspapers.

We also have links to more than 400 other web sites connected with the town, government and local authorities, schools, churches, business, social, sporting and charitable organisations, the media, surrounding villages and guides to places of interest. In fact, the list is so comprehensive that fledgling web sites which are springing up are simply adding a link to ours instead of compiling their own and we welcome their association. But perhaps the most important decision has been to continue financing the project myself and not to accept advertising thus avoiding those irritating pop-ups that are ruining so many good web sites.

The past twelve years have been a rewarding experience and although there are times when I have flagged and thought seriously of packing it in, my wife Elke, all round helper and trusty proof reader who is responsible for our envied error free presentation, a rare occurrence on the Internet, has urged me to carry on and her confidence is reinforced by the many kind messages we regularly receive from around the world. It therefore seems that we will continue and although I will be 80 in a week or so, it is business as usual for the time being.

Message from home: My wife and I have visited Bourne on several occasions to research my family history. Your web site has been very inspirational. You are doing a great job promoting the area. Keep up the good work. I don't know if it is acknowledged or whether the local authorities appreciate the web site's benefit to the community. - email from Geoff Osborne, Barnsley, Yorkshire, Sunday 1st August 2010.

Thought for the week: The Internet is becoming the town square for the global village of tomorrow.
- William Henry (Bill) Gates (1955- ), American business magnate, philanthropist and founder of the Microsoft Corporation which provides the operating systems for most of the world's computers.

Saturday 21st August 2010

Photographed by Rex Needle
Former garage site to be used for housing development

The 300-acre Elsea Park estate with a projected 2,000 homes which will bring an estimated 6,000 newcomers to the town over the next decade is the biggest single development of its type in our history and was granted planning permission in November 1999 amid much protest and controversy. Then, five years ago, South Kesteven District Council sought to appease this disapproval with an assurance that it would be the last new housing development to be imposed on Bourne.

The pledge came in an unequivocal statement to The Local newspaper which said that no more houses would be built after currently identified projects were completed (9th December 2005). In a letter to the editor, Rachel Armstrong, Senior Planning Officer, said that three sites around the town had been identified in their consultation document Issues and Options for the development of the South Kesteven district as being suitable for employment development but not residential. “No consideration has been given to their suitability for housing”, she wrote. “Indeed the document makes it clear that the council thinks that Elsea Park is sufficient to meet the town’s needs.”

This was also confirmed by town councillor Don Fisher (Bourne West), then also a member of SKDC, who said: “I was so impressed that I sought confirmation from the council’s chief planning officer and he assured me that there would be no more housing in Bourne after Elsea Park.”

It was inevitable that these words would come back to haunt us and indeed they have because since then, the building of new houses around Bourne has continued apace. Major developments approved since that promise in 2005 include the Red Hall Gardens (60 homes), Willoughby Road (42 new homes) the The Old Laundry in Manning Road (47 homes) and The Croft in North Road (68 homes) while several other projects are in the pipeline notably a farmland site in Manning Road (65 new homes) which has already been turned down once but is likely to resurface now that the adjoining land is to be developed. The latest proposal to envelop the old Raymond Mays garage on Spalding Road and the adjoining Rainbow supermarket in Manning Road will create a 5.2 acre site for 108 new homes where Persimmon Homes expect to start work later this year subject to planning approval which is sure to be granted because outline permission has already been given for the land.

The guarantee of no further housing announced by the council in 2005 was welcomed because the steady influx of new families was putting a strain on our health, education and transport facilities but fortunately the situation has begun to change. The Galletly Medical Practice has since expanded to cater for another 6,000 patients, another new primary school is planned for Elsea Park, we now have a south-west relief road and Tesco is to open an all night supermarket next year. But we still have only one petrol filling station and through traffic in the town centre remains a serious hazard for shoppers.

Broken promises by our local authorities appear to be de rigueur and although this is deplorable, no one is really surprised because housing continues to be the catalyst for change and improvements to our amenities do seem to follow, albeit slowly, and so perhaps the long awaited A15 bypass which will make such a difference for the better in Bourne may not be the pipe dream that some predict. The message to our councils is therefore clear, that housing may be acceptable at a reasonable rate of progress but it must be accompanied by a commitment to provide the necessary services if this market town is to be an attractive and convenient place to live in the future.

Hardly was the ink dry on my Diary entry last month suggesting that South Kesteven District Council should tell us more about their waste recycling initiative (July 24th) than two pages of their latest magazine SKToday were devoted to the subject and a most interesting article it is (Issue 29 August/September 2010). This was obviously coincidence rather than the council taking notice of this web site but the result was equally effective because it has given impetus to those households where the usefulness of using the silver wheelie bin is being questioned.

A check in the streets on the morning of silver bin collection day indicates that the system is inadequate with many receptacles filled to overflowing and the excess piled nearby, boxes full of newspapers and bottles and cardboard packaging in various sizes. In fact the outcome of the wheelie bin system introduced in the autumn of 2006 has now revealed that almost 80% of household refuse is recyclable while the rest goes in the black bin for landfill disposal.

Despite the original scepticism about wheelie bins, the council should be satisfied that the system has been accepted by the public but this does not mean that it cannot be improved and now that it has been running for almost four years, there ought to be an appraisal of its efficiency and perhaps an adjustment of the collections to a more suitable frequency to avoid the unsightly spread of rubbish along the pavements every fortnight.

I suggested that persistent myths about their recycling initiative might be improved with a statement about the amounts and type of waste collected, the method of disposal and the use to which this material is eventually put because once the public is told that they are making a real difference to something as important as this, the effort will increase. No sooner said than done and the magazine article took us on a tour of the Mid UK recycling depot at Caythorpe in Lincolnshire which handles the waste from Bourne after the fortnightly lorry collection and a series of photographs takes us though the process of unloading, sorting and baling the various salvaged commodities. The figures are impressive although national rather than local statistics are quoted for cardboard and paper, steel and aluminium cans, glass and plastic bottles, all recycled for use elsewhere. We are also assured that SKDC carries out regular audits to ensure that what is collected is managed as efficiently as possible.

There has been a great deal of criticism about this magazine and few think that the cost of its publication can be justified but this is one of the first features to appear that it is of real interest to householders and is clearly preferable to the turgid round of propaganda about services, councillors and officials that have filled column inches in the past. More of the same could change public opinion about it at a time when our local newspapers print fewer reports about local issues and practically none about council matters and although the magazine will never fill the gap completely it might eventually justify its own existence and the expenditure involved.

The two mortar bombs unearthed in Bourne last week are thought to be a legacy of World War Two when troops were stationed in and around the town, notably 550 officers and men from the 1st Battalion of the Parachute Regiment who were billeted here for several months prior to the Battle of Arnhem in 1944. There was also an active Home Guard battalion and so a military presence was evident from 1939 to 1945 when many familiar locations were used for weapons training and manoeuvres including the Abbey Lawn, the fields around St Peter’s Pool, now the Wellhead Gardens, Bourne Wood and Grimsthorpe Park.

It is therefore inevitable that relics from those days will still turn up in unexpected places although the army system of accounting for ordnance is usually so efficient that there must be a story behind the lapses in discipline that lead to them being unearthed more than half a century later.

The latest discovery last Friday was made by a woman digging her garden in Darnes Close when she found the explosives entangled in the roots of a tree and when a bomb disposal squad arrived from the Royal Air Force base at Wittering they were identified as being dangerous and police evacuated all six houses in the close as a safety precaution while nearby Willougby Road and a section of Cherryholt Road were closed to traffic. The bombs were taken to the gravel pits at Baston where they were exploded and life has now returned to normal in the neighbourhood although further finds at other locations around the town cannot be ruled out in the future.

These explosive devices are normally harmless and are dealt with quickly and efficiently without too must disruption for the community but they can also be a frightening experience such as that which occurred at Baston, near Bourne, in 1965. A gang of boys were out searching for firewood on Saturday afternoon, January 23rd when they entered a disused pigsty and found four wooden boxes of Molotov cocktail grenades which had sufficient power to blow up the entire village. The boys ran home and told their parents who alerted the police and soon a bomb disposal squad from the Royal Army Ordnance Corps depot at the Northern Command Ammunition Inspectorate in York was on its way to the village.

A Molotov cocktail bomb is an improvised device consisting of a bottle filled usually with petrol or some other explosive material which is ignited and thrown as a grenade. They were widely used by resistance groups during World War II who named them after the Soviet foreign minister, Mr Molotov, and the Home Guard was encouraged to make them for use in the event of an invasion. A close inspection of this hoard by the experts revealed that there were 92 grenades in all, two of them consisting of phosphorous, benzine and rubber, packed into bottles with crown tops but the contents of some had begun to deteriorate and the chemical evaporate and had they not been discovered, the result could have been devastating for the village as residents were soon to discover.

There was some alarm at the size and state of the hoard, particularly those bombs that had started to dry out to the point where they could explode and so these were placed in buckets of water and, together with the remaining 90, moved to a safe spot although during the operation, several soldiers sustained phosphorous burns. The following Wednesday, the deadly cache was split up into small consignments for transportation and each taken separately to the disused airfield at Folkingham to be detonated. The soldiers, all of them well experienced in bomb disposal, said afterwards that it was one of the most frightening explosions they had witnessed for many years. “It created a huge fireball in the sky”, said one, “and despite a strong wind, a pall of smoke hung over the spot for at least fifteen minutes afterwards.”

The pigsty where the bombs were found, 24 in each box together with a number of explosive charges, was at the rear of No 3 Church Street, a disused stone cottage owned by Mr John Thurlby of Hall Farm, Baston. During the war it had been used as a Home Guard post and as a store for explosives but the contents had been overlooked in the excitement of VE-Day and its aftermath and as the building was never again in use, they lay there forgotten but growing more unstable and dangerous with the passing of the years.

A policeman who witnessed the disposal operation, told the Stamford Mercury afterwards (Friday 29th January 1965): “Had the resulting explosion occurred in Baston, the whole village would easily have been destroyed, either by the blast or by the fire and intense heat caused by the phosphorous. The grenades had been made out of ginger beer bottles and had children tried to open one, thinking it contained pop, I dread to think what would have happened.”

Thought for the week: No one is so brave that he is not disturbed by something unexpected.
- Gaius Julius Caesar (100-44 BC), Roman military and political leader who played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire.

Saturday 28th August 2010

Photographed in 1999 by Rex Needle
Dick Sellars in his English cottage garden

Obituaries no longer command much space in our local newspapers, their inclusion being irregular and the coverage usually incomplete despite them once being one of the most widely read features.

When I worked on a weekly newspaper some sixty years ago, every district was covered by reporters on their bicycles, making regular calls on the vicar and other ministers, club secretaries, pub landlords, shopkeepers, organisers of dances and whist drives, anyone connected with this organisation or that, in order that their activities might be recorded that week because the newspaper was a mass of minutiae about events and the lives of other people which is the very essence of local journalism.

The coverage of births, marriages and deaths was considered to be of paramount interest to readers and although the hatches may not have merited much space, matches did while the despatches from this life were considered to be most worthy of publication because a well written obituary encapsulates someone’s entire existence on this earth and we hope that when we too depart, there will be space for us to be remembered, no matter how small our contribution to the community may have been.

Those weekly calls in my early days also included a visit to the undertaker to find out who was having a funeral and to the cemetery to see when and where they were being buried and this was followed by a visit to the relatives before writing an obituary of the departed. Although the editor was usually informed if anyone of note had passed on, this was often the only way we could find out if it was someone of lesser importance but all were given editorial space for a record of their lives, however insignificant that may have been.

The obituary pages were therefore regarded as essential to the newspaper’s circulation because editors realised that the death of everyone from their area should be remembered in some detail, not only as a mark of respect for the dead but also as a memorial for the future because as time passes, they join an archive to be consulted by social historians and even descendants tracing their family trees in years to come.

Unfortunately, not all editors acknowledge the value of the wealth of material that is within their grasp every week and as a result, obituaries are slowly disappearing from their pages and those which are printed are almost entirely at the behest of friends, relatives and undertakers who send in the details. The result is that this rich seam of social history is largely ignored, even for those who have made their mark in the community, and so the only mention we get is a brief paid insertion from a grieving family.

Such a notice appeared in The Local earlier this month recording the death of John Henry Wright, a few lines in the classified advertisements section saying that he had passed away on August 2nd, aged 91, and that the funeral would be held at the Abbey Church on Wednesday 18th August followed by cremation at Peterborough. There has been no obituary yet he was a leading citizen for forty years, serving the town in many capacities not least as Mayor of Bourne in 1987-88 when his wife Christine was mayoress.

John Wright was a war veteran who survived Dunkirk and began his council career as a member of Bourne Urban District Council, being elected chairman for 1969-70 and later as a member and chairman of South Kesteven District Council and Bourne Town Council. He was also a dedicated Tory and chairman of the local Conservative Association, a member of Bourne United Charities, also serving as chairman for a year with a similar spell as chairman of the Rotary Club of Bourne which was another of his interests.

But his main areas of concern during his time as a councillor was housing for the elderly, serving as chairman of the SKDC housing committee for a long spell and overseeing the building of the Stanton Close old people's complex of 26 retirement flats in Manning Road, Bourne, where he subsequently laid the foundation stone in August 1984. This alone should have merited a mention in the local newspapers.

Another familiar personality who has passed on without an obituary in the newspaper is Dick Sellars who spent his retirement years creating a classic English cottage garden adjoining his home in Main Street, Dyke, where he died on 14th August, aged 90, and is to be buried in the town cemetery on Tuesday after a funeral service at the Abbey Church. He also brought pleasure to many through his enthusiasm and advice on how to grow things to anyone who cared to ask.

The land next to Read’s Cottage was derelict when he moved in after retiring as a market gardener in 1984 but after fifteen years of hard work he turned it into a much admired showpiece. The building was originally a pair of cottages dating from 1850 and soon they were transformed into a comfortable home surrounded by this astonishing garden. It was no more than 100 ft by 50 ft but was full of shaded walks, shrubs, trees and flowers, and a surprise around every turn. Such was the acclaim the garden received that Dick began opening it to the public to share his pleasure and his expertise, an idea that proved to be so popular that it became an annual event, sometimes two and three times a year.

He was also a founder member of the South Lincolnshire Garden Society and vice-president of the Bourne Garden Club whose entries became an annual event at the prestigious Chelsea Flower Show from 1988 onwards. But most of his life was spent in his own garden and with the help of his wife Margery continued with his open days when visitors paid £1 each for the privilege of looking round and perhaps picking up a few tips and buying the odd plant while the proceeds went to one of their favourite charities.

Anyone who has ever turned a sod or clipped a hedge will know that gardening is hard work, even though it may be a labour of love. But with Dick Sellars, this garden became his hobby, his obsession, perhaps his master, but his creation was a beautiful one and a testament to the unique character of cottage gardens that lives on in England today. He became less active in his final years and the open days came to an end but the garden remains a feature of Read's Cottage although it is doubtful if anyone in the future will be able to recapture the glory that he gave it.

There have been many other examples of people who have led distinguished lives being totally ignored when they died and if the trend continues, then those who are making their mark in Bourne today and have given their time and often money for the betterment of the community cannot expect any recognition by the newspapers either and posterity will be the poorer for it.

The future of land around the Red Hall has been the subject of discussion in the Bourne Forum with fears that the library and fire station may soon be swallowed up for residential development which would end the tranquillity of this peaceful spot that has already been threatened by an estate of new houses in the vicinity. One contributor also recalled that there was once a golf course nearby and indeed there was although its existence was short-lived.

Golf was particularly popular during the late 19th century and Bourne Golf Club was instituted 1899, a modest venture with a nine-hole course that was laid out on what was then known as the Castle Meadows and adjoining fields, close to the station which was situated at the Red Hall. It was little more than a grassy surface with a few undulations but sufficient for golfing enthusiasts to pursue the ancient game.

There is no mention either of a clubhouse and members most likely used one of the nearby hostelries as their 10th hole. This information comes from the archives of The Golfing Annual for 1899-1900 and the last mention was in 1909 when the publication closed.

The Bourne Almanac, a periodic publication sold in the town from 1864-1916 for 3d. a copy, gave details of the club in its issue for 1913: President, W L Fenwick Esq., JP; committee, Messrs A R Agnew, T M Baxter, M V Camamile, C E Hodson, C C Macleod, G H Mays, T W Mays JP, C H Small. G A Story, Dr J Galletly, Dr W J Gilpin; greenkeeper J Pool (at the Bourne Institute); secretary Mr H Smith. The links (nine holes) are close to the station. Subscription 10s 6d., family ticket 21s. The club however did not survive after the Great War of 1914-18 when many in England closed down through lack of money and support.

A great chance to establish a golf course in the town was missed during the middle years of the last century. In 1968, when Councillor W E (Ted) Kelby was chairman of Bourne United Charities, he and a colleague, Councillor Jack Burchnell, put forward a scheme to establish links on land adjoining the Wellhead Field which then came under their jurisdiction. Unfortunately, when the project was examined in greater detail, it was estimated that each of the nine holes envisaged would cost £200-300 for the layout of fairways and greens and the idea was subsequently vetoed by the other trustees who did not want to spend so much money.

Recalling the proposal in 2007, Mr Kelby, now retired, said that the decision by the trustees was unwise because since those days, golf had become a major sport and therefore a big tourist attraction that would have had a tremendous impact on the local community. "I was not a golfer myself but I could see the possibilities in the town having its own course", he said. "The benefits, sporting, social and economic, would have been immeasurable and the owners, Bourne United Charities, would also have benefited, but not everyone saw it our way and so the idea died a death."

A metal plaque is currently in circulation throughout the world purporting to have originated from Bourne Golf Club during the 19th century. There are many copies around and in November 2004 one was featured in The Local newspaper with a request seeking information.

The plaques carry details of a bylaw purporting to come from Bourne Golf Club but this is most unlikely. Firstly, they are dated 1874, twenty-five years before the club was formed, and secondly, so many of them are in circulation that it is unlikely that they were ever used as a formal notice on an established golf course.

They were also most certainly mass produced because they are by no means rare and several are currently on sale for a few pounds each on eBay, the Internet market place, some from overseas including Germany, and I know that many exist in America. In addition, the bylaw quoted is unlikely to have been given prominence in any public place in Victorian England because it is obviously meant to be a humorous item with saucy connotations:

Bourne Golf Club. Byelaw No 16, April 1, 1874. Gentlemen with large handicaps are requested to play long holes from the ladies tee. N.B.: All members must observe this rule.

It would therefore seem most probable that the plaques were intended for sale to golf enthusiasts as a joke, probably at the seaside or some other entertainment venue, or even for an all male smoking concert which were fashionable in years past, and have no positive connection either with golf or this town.

Thought for the week: Golf is a good walk spoiled.
- Samuel Langhorne Clemens (1835-1910), better known by his pen name Mark Twain, American author and humorist and friend to presidents, artists, industrialists and European royalty.

Return to Monthly entries

Divider