Bourne Diary - March 2005

by

Rex Needle

Saturday 5th March 2005

The activities of Lincolnshire County Council are a closed book to most people despite its overall control of roads, schools and libraries, the police and fire brigade. Spending budget is £527 million (2003-4), the council has 77 elected members, all of whom are paid through a system of allowances, and has a staff of more than 12,000 people making it the biggest employer in the county. Bourne has two local councillors on this authority, Ian Croft, the leader, (Bourne Castle) and John Kirkman (Bourne Abbey), both seats due to be contested at the local elections in May.

This authority accounts for 80% of our council tax yet little is heard of its proceedings which are rarely reported by our local newspapers because committees and councils meet in Lincoln, thirty miles away, which is inconvenient and expensive for reporters to attend. The public is therefore left largely in the dark.

The situation is however changing. A close examination of events will give a clearer picture of how the county council operates and the dissatisfaction apparent with the current regime. For instance, did you know that the council employs 42 lawyers yet has still spent over £90,000 on outside legal advice in the past ten years? Or that a set of controversial events in recent months has squandered over £1 million of public money including several unlawful payments to former officials? All of this is important at this time when the council tax for the coming year is being determined and of course, it will again be going up by around 5%.

A new web site is now keeping the public up to date about what is going on at Lincolnshire County Council. The Orchard News Bureau is the county’s independent press agency specialising in local government and devotes its pages to a Hansard style reporting of the council’s day to day business, cold hard facts without embellishment, and you will find it instructive reading. Councillors will in future have their interests revealed, whether they have business or personal involvement that might influence their decisions, and every debate in the council chamber is reported.

I commend this extract from Friday 25th February as an example:

Senior politicians and officers at Lincolnshire County Council have less than a month to prepare for the publication of a national Audit Commission probe into the running of the authority. An official investigation into the council could result in civil servants being parachuted into County Offices in Lincoln, to take over the management of certain departments or services. But the public and backbench councillors will have to wait until the end of March to learn the outcome of the ongoing Corporate Governance Inquiry into Lincolnshire CC. It is believed that direct intervention will only happen if the final CGI report concludes that such action is necessary to turn around any "failing" departments, or even to strip councillors of their powers to run services.

What the local newspapers are saying: Contrast the content of this web site with that of County News Monthly, the county council’s official newspaper delivered to each home at an annual cost of £354,870, and you will realise just how much information you are being denied. The front page story in the March edition tells us that an extra £44 million is being spent on vital services in the next financial year but it does not tell us the total budget, how many people the council employs and how much they are getting in salary increases. “If you want more information, please telephone or email”, says the report, which I did, seeking answers to these questions, but I have not received a reply, despite the duty of the authority to do so under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act which came into force on January 1st. I put similar questions to the council’s public relations unit, which probably compares in size with the legal department, but those too have been ignored. It is little wonder that the public has become disenchanted with local government and regard it as a gravy train for those it employs.

The dilemma facing the town council over their choice of meeting place is highlighted by the Lincolnshire Free Press which reports that Ted Kelby, a 79-year-old pensioner, is insisting that as he can no longer reach the public gallery at the town hall because of ill health then an alternative venue should be found (March 1st). This does seem to be a drastic solution to suit one person but he has the latest legislation under the Disability Discrimination Act of 1995 on his side and as this states that access must be available for the physically handicapped, then the council may have to hold its meetings elsewhere to accommodate him.

It is surprising that Mr Kelby is persisting in this demand because he is a former councillor of some standing and so will know the expense involved in implementing such a move which will inevitably fall on the council tax payers of this town. We all have sympathy with the disabled, and I speak as a septuagenarian who is no longer as active as he was. But it is a fact of old age that life will never be the same as it was in years past and so we should trim our sails accordingly because physical equality has passed us by and we are never again going to pursue those energetic activities that we did in the past. Not for us playing soccer for Bourne Town or joining the Thurlby Fun Run. Mr Kelby told the newspaper that it was his hobby to attend meetings, and it is indeed commendable that we old folk should have a rewarding pastime, but to insist that the entire town should foot the bill for it not only seems to be taking things a little too far but also attaching too much importance to his presence at council meetings.

There is still a great deal of unrest among tenants over the forthcoming development of the town centre, according to The Local which reports that compulsory purchase orders for some of the required properties have not yet been ruled out (March 4th). Dissatisfaction was evident when the Henry Davidson Developers Ltd, who are to carry out the £27 million project, met home and shop owners this week to discuss the work for the first time but their main concern was to appeal for unity. Managing director Scott Davidson said that the scheme could be completed by October 2007 but added: “The timetable assumes that everything will go according to plan and there are many things that could get in the way and slow the process down but it is deliverable. The key element is the acquisition of land. If we get this done soon, we will be able to move forward more quickly.”

It is also reassuring to know that the developers have promised to retain the old grain warehouse in Burghley Street after concerns by conservationists that it was excluded from the plans which were on display at the town hall last week and there were fears that the red brick and blue slate building dating from the early 19th century might be pulled down. Brynley Heaven, a contributor to the Bourne Forum, wrote on Wednesday 23rd February that he had been in contact with the developers and had received a reply from Andy Radford, associate director, saying that the warehouse was safe in their hands and would be converted into flats. Brynley added: "The plans exhibited at the Town Hall exhibition were misleading in this respect and should therefore be disregarded on this specific site."

The property that began life as Bourne’s first department store has a new owner. The premises on the corner of Willoughby Road and Victoria Place have been standing empty for the past twenty years, used only as a storage facility, but has now been bought by Sally Lewis who plans to move her Attica business there from Cherryholt Road later this year. The original store on this site was opened by John Branston in 1860, selling a wide range of goods including household linen, curtains and fabrics, boots and shoes, men and women’s clothing, candles and groceries, and soon became the biggest retail outlet in the town, surviving a big warehouse fire on the night of Thursday 28th October 1908. The Stamford Mercury reported the following Friday:

On Thursday evening a serious outbreak of fire occurred on Mr Branston's premises in Eastgate. Mr Branston occupies a grocery and drapery premises in Eastgate and just opposite the entrance to the shop is a warehouse in which is stored brushes, candles, firelighters &c., on the ground floor and heavier goods on the top floor, which included on Thursday last a box of boots which had not been unpacked. Mr Branston was returning home on Thursday evening when he noticed a volume of smoke in the vicinity of the premises and on arriving home found it was issuing from his warehouse. On opening the warehouse door, the volume of smoke burst into flames. Buckets of water were immediately thrown on the flames and with some assistance the fire was extinguished before it spread to any of the adjoining premises. As it was, considerable damage was done to some of the stock in the warehouse by fire and water. The loss is fully covered by insurance.

Mr Branston also built a pair of houses next door in Willoughby Road that bear his initials and the date 1900 and he lived in one of them in retirement after handing over the business to his only son, Thomas and in 1909, he built the present premises of yellow brick and blue slate, the same materials used for a terrace of new houses erected in the Austerby a few years later. A stone plaque on the front records the date of construction together with his initials TEB while the name Branston has been picked out in mosaic in the front doorway. The business was sold in 1913 to George Bett who moved from Stickney, near Boston, and also became one of the town’s leading citizens, making a significant contribution to local affairs as a member of Bourne Urban District Council, being elected in 1923 and becoming chairman twice, in 1928-29 and again in 1936-37.

When he retired in 1946, the business was sold to Messrs L and H Hayhurst who remained there until 1970 when the building was bought by Geoffrey Worley, a former RAF serviceman, who used it for a furniture retail business known as Kinnsway and it has remained in his family ever since, the clock dial over the main entrance bearing their name. The shop closed 1985 when the firm moved to new premises in South Street, now run by his twin sons Barry and Michael, and the Eastgate property has since been used for storage although an application to turn it into flats was submitted to South Kesteven District Council in 2003 but the scheme did not materialise.

The new owner hopes to complete refurbishment work on the interior of the building in the next few weeks and be ready for opening in May with the addition of a restaurant and a private flat above. The shop is smaller than her present premises but has many desirable features including Victorian wood-panelled rooms, fireplaces and period doorways and windows. “It is a spacious and stylish old building”, said Miss Lewis, “the biggest shop in Bourne until Budgens opened and I plan to retain as much of the original as possible.”

It is scarcely believable but yet another application for a fast food outlet in Bourne has been submitted to South Kesteven District Council. This column discussed the issue last July when we carried out a survey which revealed that there were 32 establishments in Bourne selling food and drink which seems to be abnormally high for a population of around 15,000 and at that time, two more were in the offing, a takeaway in South Road and a café and bar in North Street.

The latter application was subsequently withdrawn but since then there has been a proposal to open a takeaway in Abbey Road and now comes yet another to convert the premises at No 64/66 North Street, formerly occupied by BDR Agriculture Ltd, into a food outlet.

The town’s present shopping centre is fast become devoid of real shops and occupied instead by estate agents, banks and takeaways that generate a great deal of late night noise and litter and it is hoped that those who are planning the new town centre will learn the lesson when allocating spaces for incoming businesses.

While walking down North Street we spotted a tell tale yellow notice fixed to a lamppost, one of those plastic-covered forms issued by the planning department at South Kesteven District Council announcing that changes are imminent in the vicinity and inviting objections from anyone who disagrees. This one informed us that it is proposed to demolish No 32, a building within the Conservation Area, and formerly occupied by Bourne Jewellers, business premises that have been empty for almost a decade.

The former tenant moved out in 1997 when the windows were boarded up, attracting graffiti and fly-posting, and a mural of multi-coloured patterns was used in an attempt to alleviate its unsightly appearance but, as one resident commented, the painting was “hideously unattractive” and the experiment failed leaving the shop a blot on the street scene and the subject of continual complaints, both from residents and visitors who regarded its unsightliness as bad for the image of the town and for trade.

The decay became so advanced that the floors were secured by scaffolding poles and part of the roof became open to the elements and in the autumn of 1999, the Stamford Mercury carried a front-page story and pictures proclaiming "Boarded up Bourne", a description that embraced other properties around the town, and although most involved in this unsightly scenario have been sold and restored, this shop has remained derelict. Development will therefore be an asset to the appearance of our main thoroughfare.

It has a long and distinguished record in the business life of the town centre, having been used as a shop for almost two centuries, and its present appearance belies a past prosperity. In February 2003, it was hoped that this dilapidation would soon be at an end because a local businessman, Michael Thurlby, bought it and announced his intention to bring it back into the commercial life of the town.

His past efforts have already breathed new life into old buildings across the street where he successfully turned Smiths of Bourne from an ancient grocer's shop into a modern public house with a sympathetic restoration that enhances North Street and it was hoped that his new venture would be equally successful. But this is obviously not to be. The yellow notice tells its own story that another of Bourne’s old properties is destined for demolition, to be replaced by new shop units.

Thought for the week: The conundrum we face is whether there is a lack of public concern about the level of council tax levied by Bourne Town Council or a general acceptance that the council can undertake any expenditure regardless of the effect on it. Is it contentment with all that we do or is it apathy? No matter what the answer is, it may well be put to the test in the months to come because of the costs of possible relocation of council meetings and expenditure for work associated with the cemetery chapel, which among other matters, are likely to be expensive. – Councillor John Kirkman, a former Mayor of Bourne, commenting on the recent decision to increase the salary of the clerk to the town council by more than £7,000 a year, despite warnings of the financial consequences, Tuesday 1st March 2005.

Saturday 12th March 2005

A lesson is to be learned by town and parish councils throughout the country from events this week at Pinxton in Derbyshire and it is that the people will take only so much before they rebel.

The headstones in the village cemetery are being checked for stability, a survey much the same as that being undertaken here in Bourne, to decide whether they are safe or likely to fall on unsuspecting visitors. Such accidents are extremely rare and a lightning strike is more likely, yet the Health and Safety Executive, which has been ridiculed in the past for some of its sillier excesses and is behind this particular piece of nonsense, requires every council in the country that administers a burial ground to expend time and money on a safety inspection that has become known as the topple test.

Official instructions are manna from heaven to some local authorities and so it has been at Pinxton and earlier this week, relatives arrived at the cemetery to tend the graves of loved ones to find that 127 tombstones had been laid flat in one day. They were angry, very angry indeed and there was an immediate protest meeting at the cemetery attended by more than 100 villagers whose relatives and friends are buried there. Parish councillors turned up in an attempt to appease them, to explain that they were only carrying out orders. But their explanations failed to defuse a very explosive situation and on Wednesday evening, a public meeting was called at the village hall and practically everyone turned up. It was a stormy confrontation and villagers threatened to take legal action over the damage to their tombstones but the parish council has now decided that it was in the wrong and are discussing ways to finance their reinstatement and to ensure that all others are safe in the future.

This is the way it should be, as I suggested in this column when the topic was discussed on 4th October 2004. Bourne Town Council now faces the same situation if the current survey produces a similar result. Some stones in the town cemetery in South Road have already been laid flat by maintenance staff when they were deemed to be dangerous in years past but the present survey will be the subject of far more stringent conditions and will therefore affect a large number of memorials, even modern ones as at Pinxton.

There are other sound reasons why this survey should either be discontinued or the consequences of it handled with more discretion. Councils, especially those at town or parish level, have a particular duty of care for the people they represent because this is their first point of contact with authority. It is therefore up to their members to protect the community from some of the more ludicrous decrees from national government and not be sucked into the morass of officialdom.

The cemetery administered by the town council is a quiet and peaceful place that contains 150 years of the town’s history, an archive of those who went before. Last year, a working party was appointed to assess the safety of the tombstones and it recommended that £10,000 be set aside during the present financial year to pay for carrying out remedial work on those which were found to be unstable but after a lengthy debate, councillors rejected this advice and decided that relatives who are still alive should foot the bill, otherwise they will be laid flat. In view of the Pinxton affair, councillors ought to reconsider this decision as a matter of urgency.

Meanwhile, the true extent of the damage to the chapel of rest in the cemetery as a result of past neglect by the town council has now been revealed and remedial work will be much higher than originally expected.

Details of a recent report by a firm of structural engineers indicate that poor surface water drainage has penetrated and weakened the walls, so reducing their ability to support the heavy stone slate roof. The plaster inside is crumbling on both the walls and the ceiling and the metal-framed windows are rusting badly. The building has no insulation, heating or mains water and the mere cost of retaining the outward appearance and continue with its present use would be around £80,000. This would pay to solve the water drainage problem, strap and underpin the walls and a new roof of a lighter material but of similar appearance to the present one.

These details are given in the town council’s newsletter for March 2004, due to be published later this month, but it also reveals another dilemma facing the authority. There is a need under the existing health and safety regulations and the Welfare at Work Act to provide adequate facilities for cemetery employees. “Their current facilities are no longer acceptable and the council has to make adjustments”, says the newsletter. “Warm running water, toilets, rest and changing rooms, are statutory necessities. The cost to provide these will depend on their exact location as the cemetery is not served by the public sewerage system. Land for further building work is limited as the cemetery has been well utilised for burials and it makes sense, if practicable, to incorporate the staff facilities into the overall plan. Rough estimates indicate a cost of £200,000 to convert the chapel building to perform all of its present and needed requirements.”

The newsletter also tells us why subsequent meetings of the council were held in private when deconsecration of the chapel was under discussion last year. “An office for the cemetery supervisor had been created by the council in a corner of the chapel and as such use is not permitted within a building that is subject to the legal effects of consecration, it had to be deconsecrated. This information was only found out by the council some four years after the office had been created. The order of deconsecration [signed on 1st December 2004] does not stop the building being used for ecclesiastical purposes.”

We are satisfied to hear this explanation but hardly think it a reason to hold meetings in secret and refuse to say why because the result has been gossip, speculation and misinformation. It is a grave error to regard the public as being dim and even untrustworthy and they should not be treated as such by local authorities and an acknowledgement of this ought help rescue the town council from similar situations in the future.

What the local newspapers are saying: The public inquiry into proposed housing development at meadowland surrounding The Croft in North Road which is due to begin on Tuesday dominates both of our main local newspapers and The Local dramatically describes it as “the final showdown between developers and townsfolk” (March 11th). The newspaper reports that our M P, Mr Quentin Davies, will be present and he and the town council have called for as many people as possible to attend and demonstrate the strength of feeling against plans to build new homes on one of the last open green spaces in the town. The report adds: “People power in Bourne was amply displayed at the informal hearing in October when the government inspector ruled that public feeling was so great that he cancelled the meeting and called a full public inquiry.”

The mayor, Councillor Mrs Pet Moisey, told The Local that councillors had formulated their own strategy for fighting the house building but press and public were excluded from the special meeting when it was discussed because “we are keeping our cards close to our chest and have no desire to warn the developers of our tactics”. T
hey do not appear to have any worries on that score for, having read the submission, I found it extremely hard to follow and an unlikely contender for an award by the Plain English Campaign. I only hope that the government inspector conducting the inquiry has more success in understanding the document.

Town councillors have been taking a final look at the site before the hearing and the Stamford Mercury carries a picture of five of them at the front gate of the Croft together with an excellent aerial view of the house and surrounding area showing in detail the pastureland that will be lost if it becomes a residential estate (March 11th).

Sightings of black panthers and other big cats in the countryside around Bourne have become commonplace but now the Stamford Mercury reports that someone has spotted a pair of wallabies on the loose (March 11th). For those whose zoological learning is marginal, I can tell you that a wallaby is a marsupial of the genus wallabia, related to and closely resembling the kangaroo but smaller, and native to Australia and the surrounding islands. The appearance of two of them on the outskirts of Aslackby, seven miles north of Bourne, where they were reportedly seen by a passing motorist, is therefore a matter of some interest although the local police do not seem unduly concerned. “We have had wallaby sightings in this area before”, said Inspector Dick Holmes. “They often escape from animal sanctuaries or private collections.” But perhaps Mike Wickens, landlord of the Robin Hood public house at Aslacky, has a more likely explanation. “Some of our customers see a variety of strange wildlife on their way home after an evening’s refreshment”, he said.

It is our custom to pop into Sainsburys supermarket in Exeter Street on Saturday mornings to buy a few essentials for the weekend and I usually pull into the pick-up space outside the main entrance to collect my wife with her purchases. Often, I have to wait for a few minutes and being of an inquiring mind, this is an excellent opportunity to observe customers leaving with their trolleys because a close inspection of the contents reveal their shopping habits.

Old people invariably have a bottle or two of red wine or sherry, sometimes gin and whisky, while single young men have an ample supply of cannies for that afternoon’s footie in front of the telly, and it is an easy task to pick out those who live alone because they have bought a small carton of milk, baked beans, a sliced loaf and several packets of ready to cook meals. But by far the most frequent commodities can be found among the groceries bought by the young mums, usually with children in tow, because they always have a large supply of crisps in those long bags that contain ten or more packets at a time.

It is therefore no surprise to learn that the British eat 10 million bags of crisps a year, more than the rest of western Europe put together, and that this could offer a partial explanation for the country’s high obesity rates. Consumption is currently running at 7.2 kilograms a year or up to three bags of crisps a week for every man, woman and child, a consumption that is growing by 3% a year.

The figures come from a market intelligence report published for the snack food industry by the business research company Key Note (The Sunday Times, 6th March 2005) and intended to provide an overview of the market and identify opportunities for growth.

The average person eats 372 snacks a year and this is likely to increase to 401 by 2009, with crisps top of the list. All of this may be big business but it does not equate with a healthy life style and, furthermore, it is not, as some headlines suggest, cheap junk food since the total cost can be quite high. Cheap food in fact, is healthy food, because the price of potatoes, greens and root vegetables, milk, cheese and other basic items necessary for a healthy diet, are far lower than what you will pay for crisps, snacks and fizzy drinks. Think twice mums next time you are hovering over the crisp and cola shelves in the supermarkets, no matter how persistent the kids are that you fill the trolley with them.

Shop watch: For the past few weeks, Anglia Home Furnishings in Manning Road have been holding a sale with up to 50% off some items and, attracted by the large colour advertisements in the local press, we went along hoping to buy a small occasional table for the lounge. But this was a sale that was not all that it seemed. Having found a suitable table, reduced in price, we tried to buy it only to be told that we could not have it and that delivery would be 8-10 weeks. It has been my understanding that sales are designed to jettison old stock that has been in the store for several months at a much higher price and, more importantly, the spirit of any sale is that you buy and collect on the spot. Any variation, as this appeared to be, is not a sale as we know it but a sales drive and customers should be aware of this when offered goods in a similar fashion in the future.

Thought for the week: We immediately assumed that hooligans had been on the rampage but then discovered that the vandals were the parish council. We were horrified at what they have done and feel that we have been let down by those who are there to serve us.
– quote from one of the angry residents at Pinxton, Derbyshire, who arrived at the village cemetery this week to find that 127 memorial stones had been laid flat after being deemed to be unsafe.

Saturday 19th March 2005

Roadworks on the A15 north of Bourne over the weekend closed the carriageway on Saturday and Sunday and the situation will be similar today and tomorrow. Lincolnshire County Council, the highways authority, has deemed these improvements to warrant drastic action and although most people will agree with them, there have been loud grumblings of discontent.

This is a perfect illustration of the no win situation. Had the council done the job over several weeks of normal day-to-day working, allowing traffic through with a lights or convoy system to regulate the flow, the complaining would have been longer and louder. The short, sharp shock treatment in which all vehicles are banned to enable the boys from the black stuff finish the job quickly is the obvious solution but you can’t please all of the people all of the time. I even heard that one old age pensioner was so upset that he might be delayed in getting to a bowls match on time that he telephoned his local councillor to protest about the inconvenience.

It did mean tedious detours for many motorists and Delaine Buses were in high dudgeon because the lengthy alternative routes meant that they could not operate their passenger services to and from Morton village, calling the total closure “political correctness gone mad” whereas it was nothing of the sort, merely a matter of well-planned expediency. There was an additional bonus too because last weekend brought a welcome relief from the constant lines of traffic passing through the town centre or, as Mike Thorne observed in a contribution to the Bourne Forum on Saturday 12th March: "We have enjoyed a little taste of what driving in Bourne would be like if we had a north-south bypass. Very nice thank you."

The sudden cancellation of the long awaited public inquiry into housing development at the Croft in North Road was a shock to the Bourne system, the entire town having been geared up to do battle to preserve this slice of meadowland.

The announcement on Monday that the government inspector appointed to conduct the hearing at the Corn Exchange the following day was indisposed means that the inquiry is back in the system and as a fresh date must be fixed, we must wait for several more weeks, perhaps months, before we know the outcome.

This is a perfect example of the wheels of the bureaucratic machine grinding exceedingly slowly and, as Councillor Guy Cudmore pointed out last November: “There is no reason why this could not have been decided locally, by locally elected democratic representatives of the people of this town.” But that would be far too simple a solution for the official mind.

In the meantime, we have a fresh example of the machinations of local government by reading an official document that has emanated from South Kesteven District Council, the authority directly connected with this planning application. It may be remembered that last October, the council distanced itself from the case by withdrawing their objections on the grounds of highway safety on the main A15 trunk road running close by the site and decided instead that their defence would concentrate on the adverse impact the proposed estate might have on the locality and that it would be out of character with the area.

There now appears to have been a change of heart in this direction because a council consultative report entitled Urban Capacity Study, just published, identifying brownfield sites suitable for development over the next 17 years, clearly shows The Croft with a potential for residential development yielding 84 properties.

Until recently, housing development on greenfield sites has been practically rubber-stamped through but the government was accused of laying waste our countryside by condemning it to bricks and mortar and, as this column reported on 5th June 2004, the policy was changed by John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, who introduced new planning regulations officially classifying back gardens as brownfield sites.

The government guidelines designated them as “previously developed land”, so enabling builders buy older properties with mature gardens and replace them with houses or blocks of flats. The Croft falls within this category and perhaps this may mean that the result of the public inquiry, when it is held, may well be a foregone conclusion. Certainly we are entitled to ask why it is included in this report as a potential site for housing development when the government inspector has not even heard the case.

Other sites in Bourne are identified as brownfield including a car parking area and unused land in Manor Lane, the old railway station site in South Road and the goods yard opposite, the bus station, the motor car auction yard in Cherryholt Road, Johnson Brothers agricultural depot in Manning Road and Wherry’s Mill in South Street, together with several others, yielding in total 284 houses.

The proposed house building policy for Bourne in the future will be that urban brownfield sites will have preference over all others, in particular greenfield sites, but new development must be in sustainable locations, well served by existing services and facilities with access to good and frequent public transport. Whether or not this criteria is met is a moot point but the fast rate of progress reflected by house building appears to set the seal on Bourne’s future because most, if not all, of the new properties are out of the price range of local people and so the town is effectively being turned into a dormitory community for centres such as Peterborough and beyond.

What the local newspapers are saying: A damning indictment of Lincolnshire County Council is carried by The Local which reveals that the Audit Commission, the independent watchdog that oversees the work of local authorities, has highlighted weak leadership and a failure to improve the quality of its services (March 18th). This will be a cause of grave concern to most people who have just received their council tax bills demanding an extra 5% for the coming year. The report says: “The council’s leadership is inadequate at a political, managerial and community level. We are not confident about the prospects for improvement in the next 12 months.”

The newspaper adds: “The report says that the leadership has still to recover from scandals including the imprisonment of former leader Jim Speechley for misconduct. It pointed out that the current leader is himself under investigation from the Standards Commission.”

The subject is also given space by the Stamford Mercury which says that the government will now step in to run the county’s schools and roads and it quotes a spokesman for the commission as saying: “This is a very worrying report for the council and for the people of Lincolnshire.”

The current leader of LCC is Councillor Ian Croft, the member for Bourne Castle. In a contribution to the Bourne Forum on Friday 18th March, Brynley Heaven suggests that with the local government elections looming, he should now consider his position and no doubt many will agree that this is sound advice.

The future of Wake House in North Street as home to the Bourne Arts and Community Trust is uncertain, reports The Local, following a decision by South Kesteven District Council to charge the full market rent rather than the nominal £5 a year as in the past (March 18th). The early 19th century property was the birthplace of the international fashion designer Charles Worth and is Grade II listed but was empty and dilapidated when the trust took it over in 1998 and it needed 18 months of hard work to bring it back to useful life, much of it by voluntary effort. In doing so, they have preserved a building which is actually the responsibility of the council and so the massive rent increase may be regarded as rather unfair. Town councillor Trevor Holmes, who is also one of the trustees, put it thus: “To hold the Sword of Damocles over our heads for a potentially massive increase in rental costs, simply to provide the same level of services, seems perverse.”

Quite so. Wake House is a busy place for a wide range of community and learning activities for all ages and to sow the seeds of doubt over its future is not a wise move by a council that purports to care for the people it represents. SKDC needs to explain itself.

The lateness in cancelling the public inquiry into housing development at The Croft only a few hours before it was due to be held has resulted in a conspiracy theory that it was deliberately called off in order that fewer people would turn up to make their objections. A report in The Local suggests that many people who arrived at the Corn Exchange for the hearing seriously believed this (March 18th) whereas a moment’s thought would have revealed it to be a ridiculous notion because those who wish to object will be kept fully informed about the date and time of the rescheduled hearing when they will be at liberty to attend. Interviews conducted by the newspaper with disgruntled residents included one with Jeremy Perkins of Queen’s Drive, who was concerned about the loss of habitats for animals, birds and plants at The Croft after the orchard was uprooted last year. “There was so much wildlife before the trees were pulled down and there is still some which needs to be protected”, he said.

Another resident interviewed was Dave Rippon who was particularly aggrieved about the postponement. “I suspect that this is a definite strategy against the voice of the people”, he said. “Someone, somewhere is trying to bulldoze this issue through. How many more houses do we really need?” Mr Rippon’s address was given as Mandalay Drive, part of the huge residential estate of 300 homes that sprang up alongside Mill Drove ten years ago when 30 acres of open countryside were swallowed up with the loss of valuable pasture land, trees and wildlife, including a ancient hedgerow that attracted hundreds of yellowhammers year after year and which have since disappeared. This is where his house is now situated.

The town is losing one of its most senior members on Lincolnshire County Council with the announcement this week that John Kirkman will not be seeking re-election in May and is standing down after serving as an Independent member for Bourne Abbey for the last 16 years. The continuing workload appears to be to blame, now likely to increase under new proposals currently under discussion, and he does have local authority commitments elsewhere for the benefit of the town.

There is no doubt that such a decision comes as a result of a great deal of heart searching by someone who has devoted so much time to public service and it must be a wrench to leave. But dissatisfaction with mounting duties was evident in January 2003 when he was quoted as saying: "A back bench councillor carries out an average 150 hours a month on county council work. That's 1,800 hours a year and to get £6,000 in allowances is less than the minimum wage."

This is not however a case of the rate for the job but of hours expended to the detriment of other activities. "Sixteen years is not as long as some", he said this week, " but it is a long period and during that time the commitment required has increased, particularly so over the last two to three years, and these responsibilities are likely to increase significantly. Having fully considered this commitment, I have come to the decision that I no longer wish to give so much of my time undertaking those duties but will, instead, use it to the benefit of my family and myself."

Councillor Kirkman was born at Boston but moved to Bourne over thirty years ago. In December 1999, at the age of 60, he retired as senior meteorological officer working for the Ministry of Defence at RAF Cottesmore, near Stamford. He has represented Bourne as an Independent at various local authority levels for the past 25 years, as a member of Bourne Town Council (since 1979), serving as Mayor of Bourne on two occasions, from 1985-86 and again from 2000-01. He and his wife Jean have two married daughters and his public work is extensive, notably as a former member of the Lincolnshire Police Authority and as the current chairman of the governors of the Abbey Primary School in Bourne and of Bourne United Charities. He is to continue to serve as a member of the town council and of South Kesteven District Council of which he is currently vice-chairman and likely to be chairman for the coming year.

Losing a familiar councillor not only disrupts our voting habits but also leads to speculation on the calibre of their successor. Standing as an Independent calls for character and dedication and although these traits may also be necessary for a candidate selected by one of the major political parties, they are less of a prerequisite because the party endorsement will usually carry them through. The Independent candidate has no such luxury and therefore only someone with a high profile and popularity is likely to make a mark running on that ticket today and as the prospect appears unlikely at the moment, the Bourne Abbey seat will most certainly fall to someone standing for one of the main political organisations. With Labour discredited and the Conservatives in disarray, this would appear to be an excellent opportunity for the Liberal Democrats but soundings this week seem to indicate a victory for the blue rosette, irrespective of who is wearing it.

Thought for the week: Licence fees for personal computers could be on the way.
- news item from ComputerActive magazine, 17th March 2005.

Saturday 26th March 2005

The story of the infamous Dr William Dodd is well known to most Bourne people because he was the wayward son of a former vicar who was executed in the 18th century after being found guilty of forgery.

He was born in 1729, the eldest son of the Rev William Dodd who was Vicar of Bourne from 1727 until 1756, and after graduating from Clare Hall, Cambridge, where he distinguished himself, he married and moved to London in 1750. He spent some time as a man about town but his extravagant lifestyle soon landed him in debt and worried his friends who persuaded him to mend his ways and so he decided to take holy orders and was ordained in 1751.

The new routine failed to change him because he faced continuing financial difficulties and in 1774, in an attempt to rectify his situation, he tried to obtain the rich living of St George's Church in Hanover Square, London, by offering a bribe of £3,000 in an anonymous letter to Lady Apsley, wife of the Lord Chancellor, asking her to use her influence on his behalf. The letter was traced to Dodd's wife and subsequently shown to the king who was so outraged that he removed his name from the royal list of chaplains.

The incident became the talk of London and Dodd became a target for ridicule in the press and even from the stage of the Haymarket Theatre and so he fled to Geneva in an attempt to escape the gossip. On his return, he was appointed to the living at Wing in Buckinghamshire and in February 1777, still short of money, he offered a stockbroker a forged bond for £4,200 in the name of Lord Chesterfield, his former pupil, but the forgery was immediately detected and he was prosecuted, sent for trial, convicted and sentenced to death. He made an abject appeal to the court but without success, as were the efforts of influential friends to secure a pardon.

They included various prominent people of the day, including Dr Samuel Johnson, the lexicographer, author, critic and brilliant conversationalist, who was the dominant figure of London literary society in the 18th century, as well as exhortations addressed to the King, the Queen and a petition signed by 23,000 people urging clemency, but to no avail and on 27th June 1777, Dodd was publicly hanged and afterwards, his clothes and possessions were sold off in accordance with the custom of the day.

That was the end of the affair, or so it was believed but a new book* that has just been published presents evidence that attempts were made to revive the corpse after the hanging, a practice that was not uncommon and often successful. It describes the life of John Hunter, anatomist, collector, surgeon and teacher, who dissected thousands of bodies in his search for knowledge, mostly delivered under cover of darkness by the grave robbers or resurrection men of the day, the practice of dissection being illegal at that time.

It was a grim trade with body snatchers fighting over the corpses of felons hanged at Tyburn Tree, the mass gallows at the junction of Oxford Street and Edgware Road in London where condemned men could be despatched eight at a time. But the practice was an inefficient method of execution and more than once the victims sprang to life again on the anatomist’s slab.

This was the fate of Dr Dodd and when the body arrived at Hunter’s house, the surgeon immediately tried to revive him but he had been dead too long before Hunter began to pump air into his lungs with a pair of bellows and he could not be brought back to life. Had he survived, what a tale he could have told. Instead, all we have of his thoughts is a notebook full of poems that was found among his possessions after the execution. This was sold and preserved and in July 2002 it was offered for sale at Sotheby's, the fine art auctioneers, at their salerooms in London when it fetched £14,340, a sum that would ironically have settled all of the unfortunate Dr Dodd's financial problems had it been realised in his day.

One of his poetic works, written in blank verse while he was in Newgate Prison, is an epic of the soul and reveals wonderful powers of reflection and self analysis and it is apparent that during those terrible days of waiting, he had flung aside all pretence and in his suffering, prayed with agony and found peace, assurance and pardon. The thoughts throb with reality. It is the pitiful tragedy of a penitent soul:

Gracious God
How wonderful a compound, mixture strange,
Incongruous, inconsistent, is frail man!
Truly, (to use his own confession) he was one
Who in his little journey through the world
Misled, deluded, oft, mistook his way.

What the local newspapers are saying: A sequel to last week’s coverage of the damning report on Lincolnshire County Council by the Audit Commission is reported by the Lincolnshire Free Press which says that the leader, Councillor Ian Croft, the Conservative member for Bourne Castle, stepped down at a special meeting of the authority together with the entire cabinet (March 22nd). “The resignations came after the council was branded as weak and unlikely to improve without help”, says the report. “Councillor Croft said that it was in the best interests of the county that he leave his post.” The 76 members of the council will now select a new leadership to run its affairs until the local government elections on May 5th. Opposition Labour group leader, Councillor Rob Parker, told the meeting: “If we don’t get it right then, we will have control imposed from Whitehall.”

Work on the long-awaited east-west relief road is nearing completion, according to The Local and is expected to open at the end of next month (March 25th). Favourable weather has enabled the project continue at a steady pace and soon traffic travelling between the A15 to the south of Bourne and West Road on the Stamford side will be diverted away from the town centre. It is to be hoped that this progress report from Lincolnshire County Council is a correct one this time because we have had assorted dates in the past and none have materialised but it must be true this time because we are told that an official opening ceremony is planned after the local elections on May 5th although drivers will be able to use the new highway once it is complete in the next few weeks.

One of Bourne’s old established family businesses is featured in the Stamford Mercury over the headline “Shoe shop stands the test of time” (March 25th). It tells the history of North’s Shoes in North Street, opened in 1876 and still owned by the same family, being run today by Roger North, aged 59, great grandson of the founder William North, a boot maker from Haconby. The business has passed from father to son for four generations, proof that personal service will always pay and that the small shops can survive in the face of competition from the big stores. Optimism for the future is still the keynote because Roger told the newspaper: “We have been here for 129 years and who’s to say that we won’t be here for 100 more. We started selling hobnailed boots and now we stock hand-painted pink wellies. Times and fashions change over the years but our principles of good service and quality products remain the same.”

The personal computer, or PC as it is more popularly known, has become a boon to local historians enabling them to assemble facts and photographs in an orderly fashion and then publish the results for the community to enjoy. As a result, many villages now have their own histories, usually the work of knowledgeable and enthusiastic amateurs who are willing to dedicate time and often money to the task for the benefit of all.

The latest comes from Carlby, just off the A6121 four miles south west of Bourne, and although the village is isolated, it is surprisingly picturesque with a mix of attractive properties both ancient and modern, not least the old inn, now a private residence that still boasts the wooden support post but no sign. All of this can be found in the new history Carlby Then and Now, the work of Ian Dair who has collected sufficient information to fill 62 interesting pages about its life and times.

Ian and his wife Margaret moved to the village from Peterborough when they retired three years ago. "We came here because we knew some people and it was handy for the golf course at Toft", he explained. “Since then we’ve grown to really like the place." His research has revealed the enormous growth of the village in recent years, increasing from 99 houses in 1991 to 189 ten years later, and the impact this expansion has had on its character. "People like us have been glad to come here and the new residents have had a friendly welcome. But many of the older villagers feel that the togetherness of Carlby, when there were many fewer folk, has gone, a sentiment that is shared by most other villages as a result of the decline in agriculture and the influx of newcomers who live there but work elsewhere."

There are many photographs in the book, some modern and many from the past, including one that gives a name to the old inn I mentioned. It was known as The Plough, and what else in a farming area, but I learn that it was closed circa 1970 because the brewery which owned it decided that it would not be financially viable to update the facilities, especially the outside toilets. The entire publication has a warm community feel about it and will be welcomed by village veterans and newcomers alike as a record of the way things were and are now. If you want a copy, details may be found on the Notice Board.

Shop watch: The number of checkouts at Budgens supermarket has been reduced from eight to four and the resulting space is being used for display. This, coupled with more rumours of staff redundancies, suggests that closure might again be imminent. This possibility surfaced last September when the company issued a statement admitting that sales were not good but they hoped to entice more car-borne customers to keep the store viable. Budgens has become part of the commercial life of Bourne and their loss would be a major blow. The supermarket is the centrepiece of a busy retail area with the market place on one side and the Burghley Centre on the other, all three interactive and never more so than on Thursday market days and on Saturdays, both busy shopping periods. Let us hope that the latest developments are not a sign of pending closure.

Thought for the week: The love of life is necessary to the vigorous prosecution of any undertaking.
- Samuel Johnson, British lexicographer and writer (1709-84) whose Dictionary of the English Language appeared in 1755.

* The Knife Man by Wendy Moore is published by Bantam and reviewed
by Nigel Hawks in The Sunday Times, Sunday 6th March 2005.

Return to Monthly entries

Divider